Any update on 1:1 subnet NAT over IPSec

[spiffydudex]

This is the main problem and reason we do not use Untangle more often is the painful creation and removal of 1:1 subnet NAT for IPSec connections.

Has or will this be addressed in upcoming releases?

[gravenscroft]

T…the painful creation and removal of 1:1 subnet NAT for IPSec connections.

To what end?

[spiffydudex]

To what end?

1:1 subnet NAT over IPSec VPN is very common with cloud providers of LOB applications.

This post describes the issue: 1:1 NAT (not port forwarding) Entire Subnet - Edge Threat Management Forums - Arista

This is the document that discusses this process. NAT over IPsec VPN using an IP Alias – Edge Threat Management Support - Arista (untangle.com)
This document describes 1:1 NAT and how it is configured for an individual host - 1:1 NAT - Edge Threat Management Wiki - Arista

We have Sophos units in place at the locations that required the 1:1 subnet NAT, they are up for replacement soon and I was wondering if the setup of this is still an individual IP mapping or has this been addressed properly?